Quick Answer
On 3 November 2026 Next.js released 16.4.5 and 15.5.29 with fixes for seven vulnerabilities, mostly in caching (use cache and Cache Components), image optimization and cookies on Edge routes. Upgrade with npm install next@16.4.5 or npm install next@15.5.29 and redeploy. If you are still on 14.x or skipped October's release, upgrading matters more: a critical remote code execution bug fixed on 14 October affects every version from 10.0.0 up to 15.5.27.
What Shipped on 3 November
Next.js announced the release a week early, on 27 October, and published it on 3 November: 16.4.5 for the Active LTS line and 15.5.29 for the Maintenance LTS line (Next.js blog, GitHub releases).
GitHub rates all seven advisories Moderate, with CVSS 4.0 scores from 6.0 to 6.9. The Next.js blog post labels one of them, the unstable_cache disclosure, High. Neither page lists a fix for 14.x or older, and none of the November advisories' affected ranges include 14.x.
Most of these bugs need a specific feature or hosting setup to matter. That is good news, but it means you have to know which features your app uses. If an AI tool wrote your app, it may use the use cache directive or Edge routes without you having chosen them.
The Seven Advisories
| Advisory | What goes wrong | Affected | Only when |
|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-119790 | Cached data from one root param value (for example, one tenant) can be shown for another | 16.3.0 to 16.4.4 | A 'use cache' function that reads a root param is called both directly and through unstable_cache() |
| CVE-2026-119349 | One user's cached result can be shown to, or poisoned by, another user | 16.0.0 to 16.4.4 | use cache functions take binary arguments such as Uint8Array or Blob |
| CVE-2026-119351 | Cache leaks across root param values | 16.2.0 to 16.4.4 | Nested use cache functions where the inner one reads a root param through next/root-params |
| CVE-2026-119350 | Shared fallback pages can be poisoned through request-supplied route params | 16.4.0 to 16.4.4 | Self-hosted with next start, cacheComponents: true and Partial Prefetching off |
| CVE-2026-119348 | One client's response can be injected into or disclosed to another | 16.0.0 to 16.4.4, and 15.5.28 or earlier | Self-hosted behind an HTTP/1.1 reverse proxy that allows pipelining, with route handlers returning a fetched response unchanged |
| CVE-2026-119347 | The image optimizer processes SVG files even with dangerouslyAllowSVG: false |
16.0.0 to 16.4.4, 15.0.0 to 15.5.28 | Self-hosted, with an image backend that can decode SVG |
| CVE-2026-119346 | HttpOnly cookies are exposed through an internal response header | 16.0.0 to 16.4.4, 15.0.0 to 15.5.28 | Edge runtime routes that set cookies with NextResponse.cookies.set(); the blog says Node.js route handlers are not affected |
Two advisories come with a workaround. For CVE-2026-119350, set partialPrefetching: true in next.config. For CVE-2026-119790, stop calling the 'use cache' function through unstable_cache(). The other five list no workaround, so upgrading is the fix.
Are You Affected?
Start with the version you actually run, not the one in package.json. The lockfile decides what gets installed:
# Prints the installed next version
npm ls next
If it shows 16.4.5, 15.5.29 or later on those lines, you have the November fixes. If not, check which of the risky features your code uses (in a macOS or Linux terminal, or Git Bash on Windows):
grep -rn --exclude-dir=node_modules --exclude-dir=.next \
-e "use cache" -e "unstable_cache" -e "runtime = 'edge'" -e "dangerouslyAllowSVG" .
No hits does not mean you can skip the upgrade. Five of the seven advisories list no workaround, and staying behind makes the next upgrade harder. The advisories also do not say Vercel patches your app for you: the fixes ship in the next package, so they reach production when you upgrade and redeploy.
If You Skipped October's Release
The November fixes sit on top of a bigger 14 October update. Its headline bug is CVE-2026-96889: unauthenticated remote code execution in the Image Optimization API when SVG files are used. It is rated Critical (CVSS 4.0 score 9.5) and applies when Next.js runs on glibc-based Linux.
- Affected: every version from 10.0.0 to 15.5.27, and versions after 16.0.0 up to 16.4.0. That includes all of 14.x.
- Fixed: 15.5.28 and 16.4.1, so the November versions are outside the affected range.
- Workaround if you cannot upgrade today: make sure the
sharpversion Next.js uses is 0.35.5 or later.
The same October release fixed a second critical bug in use cache with typed arrays (GHSA-673q-mjm6-r5xr, no workaround) and a high-severity denial of service in Server Actions (GHSA-p3m5-59mp-jv5r). If your app is on 14.x, no 14.x fix is listed for any of these, so the path forward is a major upgrade to 15.5.29 or 16.4.5.
How to Update Safely
The common failure is not forgetting to upgrade. It is upgrading on one machine while the lockfile, CI or the deployed build still uses the old version.
// Bad: pinned to a version inside the affected ranges
{
"dependencies": {
"next": "15.5.20"
}
}
// Fixed: an exact patched version, committed together with the lockfile
{
"dependencies": {
"next": "15.5.29"
}
}
- Run the install command for your line:
npm install next@16.4.5ornpm install next@15.5.29. - Commit
package.jsonand the lockfile together, so CI installs the same version. - Run your build and tests, then redeploy. A fix that is not deployed protects nothing.
- Run
npm ls nextagain in CI or the build log to confirm what shipped.
VibeDoctor's Vibe Check runs Trivy against your lockfile and flags dependencies with known CVEs in its vulnerability database, with the installed version and the version that fixes it. It also flags loose version ranges and a missing lockfile. Free to sign up.
For the code-level side of Next.js security, see Server Actions pitfalls in AI-written code and how CVE scanning with Trivy works.
FAQ
Which Next.js version should I be on after November 2026?
16.4.5 or later on the 16.4 line, or 15.5.29 or later on the 15.5 line. Those are the versions the 3 November release names, and both are outside the affected range of October's critical image optimization bug.
Is my app safe if it is hosted on Vercel?
Three of the seven November advisories say they apply to self-hosted apps only. The rest do not state a hosting scope, and none of the advisories say Vercel patches your app for you. Upgrade the next package and redeploy either way.
Is Next.js 14 still getting security fixes?
None of the October or November 2026 advisories list a 14.x fix, and October's critical SVG bug affects 14.x. Plan the move to 15.5.29 or 16.4.5.
How severe are the November bugs?
GitHub rates all seven Moderate, with CVSS 4.0 scores from 6.0 to 6.9. The Next.js blog calls the unstable_cache disclosure High. Most need a specific feature, such as use cache, Edge routes or self-hosting, to matter.
Do I need to change my code?
Usually no: upgrading is the fix. The two exceptions with workarounds are setting partialPrefetching: true and not calling a 'use cache' function through unstable_cache(), which you only need if you cannot upgrade yet.